| JEMC said: If AMD can manage to get a 232mm2 chip beating or coming close to the monsters that are their Fiji chips (at least Fury), it would be awesome! But that could bring some trouble with cooling and heat density.
Oh, and it's a few days old but somehow I missed this piece of news: THE PC GAMING SHOW IS BACK FOR 2016 http://www.pcgamer.com/the-pc-gaming-show-is-back-in-2016/
|
It would be nice for AMD to come close to those monsters in such a small space for their sake and I don't think heat density should be much of an issue with the clocks that GPUs run at ...
The Fury X was a missed opportunity with AMD betting on more compute and bandwidth. Their DX11 drivers ain't bad but they would have had a better deal with a bigger frontend to lower submission overhead and 5 geometry processing units and maybe 60 CUs ?
As for the PC Gaming Show it was very horrible from what I heard and based on the announcements last year so I'm not particularly excited for this years showing ...
Essay Pro