| fatslob-:O said: There were tons of successful revolutions in history including the last century and very big ones at that ... The power of the 99% cannot be ignored as they are the ones who shaped the world we see today. What you simply say about ousting soverignty simply isn't true. The wrath of the poor is far more stronger than the wrath the extremely rich or those who hold power in politics than you make it out to be ... On the contrary yes it is. Businesses have the privilege of doing such. That action is not meant to be such for the citizens according to common laws. It is the public who deprives each other of their wealth, not the rich ... Note how that definition is an "idiom" instead of the common context that I am using it in this case such as definitions 1 and 3 ... You can try and argue it as much as you want but I declared the meaning beforehand so you must use it ... |
The majority of rebllions are crushed, they far outweigh the ones that are successful, when the 1% have armies armed to the teeth and the 99% are fighting with pitch forks 70% of the time the 1% win, the Romans destroyed many rebellion before their own corruption brought them down. You just have to look at the sytem now, who were in charge before? The rich, who are in charge now? Still the rich, the successful rebellions are backed by others in power.
The is no rule what so ever that forbids citizens from using offshore and non that makes it exclusive to companies, this is a fabrication on your part, again you're defending comnpanies and rich people who do this but nocking anyone else, it's a contradiction to your argument.
You can declare what ever meaning it doesn't make it concrete beyond reason, nothing in the meanings say that it's the job of the people to do the governments work in enforcing the law, responsibilty is a broad term across many situations which is why it doesn't back your stance, the Greek people were looking after number 1 that is self responsibility as well, not to mention you're arguing responsibility yet want to absolve the govenrment of their responsibility in upholding the system, another one rule for one another rule for others stance you've built.
