SecondWar said:
I get where you're coming from but I have to disagree. There a YouTube video that points out the inherent flaw with the ending (my iPad won't let me link to it). The destroy option, the thing you've been working towards throughout the entire series is painted as the worse option. This could have been made as a moral point, but until you meet the catalyst it is still your overall aim. Then other options are either the aim of Cerberus (control) or Saren (synergy) so you basically end up doing their work for them. Even reject is flawed as you can't point out the ridiculous flaw in the catalysts logic - he wants to preserve organic life, and does so by continually destroying organic life. |
I guess it coms down to interpretation.
I don't know, to my mind something going seriously against humanity's interests in the end-game always seemed inevitable.
@ the thread.
Wow. This went places. I think what it goes to show is that one way or another there is an enormous amount of interest in this franchise, and I cannot wait for Andromeda!
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS