eva01beserk said:
You are going to nit pick the one true racist in all thouse articles and stick to that? ok. It dosent change anything. He was a racist and even I mention in the description that he was a racist. Theres no hiding it. The point is that man was on his free time walking around and happen to pass some people with and behaved poorly. Then the people wwent to such an extreme to publicly show it and ask others to do the dirty work and facial recognicion him to find his name and work place to have him fired. It had nothing to do with his job. Where you to tell me, that he was on duty and to the place of contract he called the owner a monkey and made the noises then yea, he should get fired then, but this was entirely uncalled for. Where do you draw the line? Do you think we should have peoples homes randomly checked and make sure everithing is hate free? if not mark them to make sure he is diferent so he can be a pariah. check their record to make sure they have at least one black friend? if a small town is all white have them acused of being a kkk town? Give chidren hate test every month to make sure they are tolerant? and if not expelled them. You tell me when the freedom starts. |
The bold is a joke, right? You're trying to claim that I, the person who has over, and over, and over, and over again said that this is a product of our right to free speech, and that it's the price we pay, want government to sensor people that might say something offensive? Are you kidding me? Did you read aaannnyyyyttthhhiiinnggg that I wrote?
In fact! You seem to be the one with the issue as far as the first ammendment goes (though, you still haven't provided an alternative). You seem to believe that the rights of the offensive are more important than the rights of the offended. Which I have to say, I disagree with because in my opinion, they are equal. Which is pretty much how it works, as long as the will to make it so is there. Actually, you provide a pretty good example so...thanks for that.
A woman overhears a guy make a joke she fines offensive, makes a stink about it, and gets him fired. Then, people get mad at her, and get her fired.
Equal protection under the law, in this case...no protection under the law. Because we, as adults, should be capable of handiling these situations on our own.
If you have a problem with that, I hear feminists don't have much say in....oh, I don't know, Burma? Sure, Burma, I'm sure you'd love it there. Though, I'd get there soon. I hear there are some SJW upstarts fighting for things like freedom of the press.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.







