Wyrdness said:
Considering you earlier said PS3 had no new games for 2 years which is false I don't think you buying more for your PS4 really says much, Zelda, FFXV and Persona 5 simply aren't handled in the best way and tbh Zelda is very likely to be delayed not because of development but as a TP style move for an NX version. FFXV was a development disaster going through 3 different engines, 2 teams and being put on the back burner as the team were pulled off the game to help develop FFXIII and XIV. Persona 5 ironically backs my point as it was a PS3 game that got a PS4 version and was delayed as a result but it only takes 5 people to do the latter under your logic right, Twilight Princess highlights what I'm saying as well, it's been commissioned to fill the gap left but Zelda U's extended development as was Uncharted for the fourth game, an easy option rather then grind to get the two games out or maybe it was planned to delay the games and just use remasters for the time period instead, either way it's not good for consumers if remasters start becoming a habit. |
Wow!! You just said that about Persona 5.....I'm speechless. You talk as if they have made the ps3 version and that they'll have like 5 people remaster it for ps4. Just no, no, no!!!
The game is in constant development for both platforms and they're very different systems to make games on.
The point about ps3 is oh so valid. This gen I've bought more new ps4 games than the ps3 at the same point in time and additionally some remasters. It's just such a perfect mix. It's been such a good start to the gen and it's only warming up.
You're theory that the devs would have released their ps4/X1 games much faster if they didn't release remasters is absurd. I'm sure 1 or two would release a little sooner but the vast majority just no.
Go on name all the games that are suffering from this lazy dev syndrome due to porting remasters. This should be fun
