AEGRO said:
So GAME A with a Meta Score of 50 developed in ONE YEAR was more efficiently developed than GAME B with a Meta Score of 90 developed in TWO YEARS? GAME A has a Meta Score of 50 for every year in development. GAME B has a Meta Score of 45 for every year in development. GAME A >>>>> GAME B |
You're missing the point. He took more than two times as long to develop a game that's worse than his first one according to critics. That's poor efficiency.