vivster said:
Ruler said:
vivster said:
Ruler said:
vivster said:
Well if the consoles would kindly die already we wouldn't have any debates. We wouldn't have silly exclusives and powerpoint slideshows sold as "games". |
yeah so we can argue about which graphicscard manufacture is better, so much more exciting than consoles? I defeniatley take the Consoles exclusives over anything else exclusivley on PC these days.
|
Well first of all, we already do that and second of all, the majority already agrees that AMD is crap.
And exclusives are bad no matter on which platform they are. Though they're worse on consoles because there they are forced to perform below their potential, which is just cruel.
|
And your attitude is why there is an Intel/Nvidia monopoly on PC now.
I thought PC had emulator making everything supirior to the original console release?
|
Personally I have no problem with an Intel/Nvidia monopoly. I do not depend on cheap hardware.
There would be no need for emulators if there were no consoles. And the fact that console manufacturers make it harder with every generation to create emulators shows that they acknowledge how bad PCs could make those consoles look.
|
there are emulators because PC games stopp working on newer OSs and Hardware. Its easier for PC gamers to emulate consoles versions than playing their own versions on the latest Windows
