Swordmasterman said:
Good to know, but Why are some companies showing Q2, while others just Q1 ?. |
AsGryffynn explained it very well... Fiscal Year doesn't have mandatory calendar year start from one company to another, they just have to keep the same on theirs own reports.
AsGryffynn said:
The good part. |
Then I'm happy =]
KLAMarine said:
Numbers! Good ol' numbers! Math is a lovely thing.
I think this is the first I've heard of this. I generally don't make a habit out of looking up financials. Good to know. |
It's been a runing topic on the forum to say that Sony is a lot bigger than Nintendo, but Nintendo makes a lot more profits. Also had the discussion that gaming department of Sony is very inferior than Nintendo on profits as well.
One thing I'll never understand from customer is the proud of the company they buy having gigantic Margins... like some people here talk proudly of Nintendo expending 20M to make a game that will generate 500M revenue while laughing at a Sony game that costed 100M and had revenue of 150M.
I would feel extorted as a Nintendo customer and pleased as a Sony customer if those were the numbers. Because first case shows that I'm paying much more than what the product should cost and on second it's a acceptable margin. Even though I have several games that were probably unprofitable and I'm happy they were made even so.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







