By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Danuch on 31 January 2016
Edit Thread
Jimbo1337 said:
Danuch said:

I understand you bro.

But would you rather have a president like Geroge Bush how acctually was more of a puppet then a man with a clear conscious and critical thinking? I rather see a USA president that can see threw the lines and not one like Geroge Bush how just did what he was told. And we have seen what happens when the congress get what they want., a la Geroge Bush invading Iraq and Afganhistan, cost the USA citizens 1,1 trillon dollars at the end 2010 and 2,47 trillon dollar by 2017. Now iam not a American and i dont need to understand politics and such but thats a waste of money. And above that anti-americansism is growing more and more over the world. European countries are battling with refugess from the middle east. I dont see the US helping these refugess in anyway.

The reason for ISIS being so strong today is actually all the Americans fault, if Saddam would have stayed in power he would have slaughtered every terorist. But instead the American goverment choose to attack and kill him. Which is ironic because the US goverment put Saddam in power in Iraq to fight the Iranian goverment (Khomeini) which the US goverment help get to power. Funny isnt it? I bet Geroge Bush didnt know this and so does none of the Republican candidates there just money and power hungry idiots.

Like Jimi Hendrix said: When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the the world will know peace.

Bill Clinton wanted to invade Iraq when nobody else was talking about them during his presidency.  So why are you blaming Bush for the things that every president would have done if they were in his shoes at the time.

The reason for ISIS is Obama's fault!  We had military bases over there and Obama made everyone come home.  What did Obama think would happen? By removing our troops out of Iraq like that, Obama ended up creating a power vacuum.  You remove the US troops, then another power needs to fill that void (ISIS).  

Obama walks into a room and he thinks that he is the smartest man in the room.  You talk to anyone in the US military and they will all say that he is a complete and utter moron when it comes to making the right military decisions.  

So now we spent like 2 trillion dollars for the war on Iraq and we have nothing to show for it.

Where are talking about Obama not Bill Clinton.

1. Obama was against the war in Iraq!
Lets say he was in charge back then he would not invade Iraq, hence none of your fellow Americans would not die (5000) and no trillion of dollars wouldnt haev been spen and on top of all that 1,5 million Iraqis would been killed. Last but not least the bank crisis was a result of a need to fuel the economy in America, hence no bank crisis.

See my point?

No war = No Americans killed = Saddam alive = No ISIS/terrorist = More dollars to Americans = No bank crisis = No big wave of immigrants to Europe from Iraq, Syrian and Afganhistan = Less fasicism in Europe = Less anti Americanism.

 

"The reason for ISIS is Obama's fault!  We had military bases over there and Obama made everyone come home.  What did Obama think would happen? By removing our troops out of Iraq like that, Obama ended up creating a power vacuum.  You remove the US troops, then another power needs to fill that void (ISIS)."

I dont get it? Did you want America to invade Iraq or not? Because its sounds like it.