By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wright said:
DonFerrari said:

Very poorly suggested changes that was requested by the very minority. Would be one of those cases that her request would cost a lot more to the game than they would get. She can just not play the game.

Why would it cost a lot more? They are remaking the game from scratch, and selling it in parts, right? So that means they don't have all the parts made yet, and thus, these changes can be made without compromising the time, money or graphics they have already done at this point.

Not talking about the cost to implement the changes, but the backlash of changing the games to pander to her needs.

And why are you being so defensive of this poorly written "opinion piece"?

SJW ask several silly things put on the games even knowing that those changes not only limit the freedom of the authors but also end up attracting no new customers.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."