AlfredoTurkey said:
I'm hoping Rockstar puts one of these "feminists" in their game as a character and exposes them... figuratively and literally. If anyone has the balls to do it, it's them. |
That would be totally awesome and funny
thismeintiel said: The problem with feminists is they confuse sexualization with sexism, willingly a lot of times. Just because something is sexualized doesn't mean it's sexist. Sexist means the creator has a real disdain for women and feels they are far lesser beings than men. And men are also sexualized to appeal to women. Another thing they confuse is acknowledging the difference in both sexes with seeing them as a lesser being. This all results in them not only wanting sexy female characters changed, but also female characters with little to no flaws, which really just makes those "perfect" women characters boring. |
Yes... we will all be obligated to think woman we don't think is attractive as totally hot and brave (like we need to clap for their ability to eat a lot more than necessary) and the ones we think is attractive as sluts. So low self-esteem that they need to prove the world is wrong and they are right.
pastro243 said: People should just stop demanding and complaining about other people's artistic views and make their own game with their own moral standards |
Maybe because the only ability most of those people have is complaining.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."