By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Swordmasterman said:
DonFerrari said:
AsGryffynn said:

Because I wanted to point out companies grow with their economies? 

Owww I see, no problem. And yes when economy in a country thrives companies have opportunity to grow, although some times they grow even more when the country is facing an adverse situation.

How they grown "when the country is facing an adverse situation" ?, you mean more purchases, and cheaper manufacture of products, because of weak coin ?.

Not only that... there are some companies that grow on adversity, some times because their competitors can't adapt and resist, leaving the market open and in other cases because they are much cheaper and people now having less money start to look at them.

KLAMarine said:
DonFerrari said:
KLAMarine said:

This is why arithmetic exists.

And where would you apply arithmetics on the suposition?

Seeing as how we don't have numbers pertaining to any of the Big 3's employee salaries, we can't do much but work off of assumptions. Since both make consumer electronics, I assume both Nintendo and Sony hire similarly-paid workers so the average across their workforce would not be very different.

Of course it would. Sony have a lot more areas and certainly a different distribution of labor and in some cases more outsorced production. Nintendo makes some HW and a lot of SW while Sony as a whole makes a lot more HW than SW. So the type of professionals and the profit margins are very different.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."