By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RadiantDanceMachine said:

There isn't any ad hominem in there, merely a classification of your views which are delusional by definition since they are contrary to evidence. You continue to argue that he is a sound businessman, despite all the proof to the contrary. [delusional]

You've yet to proctor any semblance of a rebuttal. Burying your head in the sand and pretending the sources I posted do not exist is not a rebuttal.

Are you going to rebut the cold, hard objective facts I've already posted (you can't, because they are facts) or are you going to continue to pretend I've hurt your feelings?

Time to simply admit you're wrong.

Calling someone delusional and asking if their trolling is against the rules but I'll go easy on you since you'll learn the hard way ...  

I don't pretend that your sources do not exist, it's just that you've yet to understand that their irrelevant for the most part. What matters is how you strive to have wealth like his, not constantly gawk and dwell on his failures like his hater's would ... 

Your facts mean nothing when he's not in jail for what you claimed him to be ...  

You seem very upset that you can't do anything but debase anyone's value ...