By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLAMarine said:
DonFerrari said:
KLAMarine said:

Profit per employee? I'm not sure what you mean by this.

You profited 1B dollars with 1000 employees or 100,000 employees... most would think the first operation is a lot better (of course the margin would be more interesting). It's similar to what you done with assets/employee

Wouldn't the first case be better?

probably but if your margins is the same or with 100000 employees have better margin? Like 1000 are all very highly paid engineers and the second lowly paid labour that end up costing less??

The only point that would certainly favor the first one is if the paycheck don't differ much they would have less passive/liabilities... but to properly judge more data is necessary



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."