SilentWolf on 13 May 2008
| Picko said: Firstly, in statistical terms OoT does not really have enough reviews for those reviews to be a reliable indicator of the games quality. Worth noting that basically no game does but the like ot OoT are particularly bad and no real meaning can be obtained by looking at the "average". Secondly, even looking at the "raw" scores there is very little difference between any of the top ten. This is particularly so given the first point I made, there is no statistically significant difference between their raw scores and no conclusions can be made about which game is better. Sad I know. |
I thought that in statistics you only needed 31(random..ish) samples to be able to safely say that you have enough to represent the whole. If true that would put OoT at (barely) enough reviews to say that its current percentage is a good representation.
