By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Swordmasterman on 25 January 2016
Edit Thread
KLAMarine said:

Eddie_Raja said:

KLAMarine said:
Eddie_Raja said:

and the 3DS isn't going to sell even half as well as its predecessor.   In fact (outside of the Wii) every Nintendo home console has sold worse than the one before it.  If they start hemoraging money as bad as Sony used to it would destroy them pretty quick.

I doubt it'll get that bad. For starters, Nintendo's not in the mobile phone business. Apple and Samsung have that on lockdown.

It is already that bad my friend.  One more descent into lower sales and things will start to look hopeless.

I don't recall Nintendo ever posting a loss to the tune of $1.2 billion.

Eddie_Raja said:

Not sure why you keep denying that the massive size of Sony/MS gives them armor.

Because WHEN YOU DO THE MATH using OP's figures, you'll see Sony's armor is not as thick as you think.

Let's do the math using the following formula:

cash and short term investments + assets - liabilities - debts = "armor"

Nintendo:

$7.6 billion + $11.3 billion - $1.5 billion - $103,000 = $17.4 billion

Sony:

$15.7 billion + $132 billion - $107.6 billion - $18 billion = $22.1 billion

Microsoft:

$96.5 billion + $176.2 billion - $96.1 billion - $7.5 billion = $169.1 billion

As one can see, Sony's "armor" is much much closer to Nintendo's "armor" than to Microsoft's "armor". Microsoft's "armor" is huge compared to Sony's "armor", they're not even comparable.

With that said, the problem for Sony is that Sony is a much larger company than Nintendo. Sony employs about 130,000 people (http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/csr_report/employees/info/) while Nintendo employs about 4,000 to 5,000 (http://www.numberof.net/number%C2%A0of%C2%A0nintendo%C2%A0employees/, https://www.macroaxis.com/invest/ratio/NTDOY.PK--Number-of-Employees).

Sony has more people on the payroll than Nintendo, they have more wages to pay, more facilities to pay for but only have about $4.7 billion more in "armor" than Nintendo and about $147 billion less "armor" than Microsoft.

The reasoning above is why in my opinion, Sony is the weakest among the three.

 

I'm not a business major so my opinion is rather worthless and if any business majors reading this post detect faulty reasoning in my logic, please let me know.

Actually, who are in more markets like Sony, and Microsoft, have a "Extra Armor", because if some market goes wrong, you can cut it, re-negociate the Debts that you have, and move to more profitable Markets, and with the Assets, and the Cash, you have in bank, is enought to make it before you went Bankrupt, but Nintendo, would only became small if it fell, but not go Bankrupt, Actually none of those 3 companies have a possibility of go Bankrupt, because Those companies made a lot of money from gaming, and other divisions, and are the only 3 Companies on the Console Market.