| Moongoddess256 said: Kasz, no one said men don't get raped by women. Thats why I said I don't know what that has to do with anything. You've been writing essays on something I haven't been arguing against. I provided a quick statistic I found on google because I thought it was a bit ludicrous to be trying to say that women raping men is even remotely as common as men raping women. The only thing I've been arguing is how you all have been saying things that don't tie into the original point... or the beginning of the derailing of this thread at all. Its as if you didn't read what I wrote, or perhaps you read it and misinterpreted it or twisted it. And because of how it was like you were ignoring me completely, I was more than a bit disgusted. I'm kind of glad this thread got derailed though, the only reason why I posted in it was because I was really disgusted with some of the things you people were saying. Theres a difference between voicing your opinion and being disrespectful. |
You said.
"Also, I have a little grudge against "men" due to things like sexual assault. Some guys go a little too far to get laid. It doesn't leave a good impression of men in general when guys are willing to go to jail and traumatize a girl just to get their dicks wet. "
Doing so implies that Men are the only people that rape since you have nothing against women despite women being capable and doing the same things. You never once suggested that men don't get raped by women until you posted that statistic which seemed to attempt to minamize it. (Which was biased because of the above reasons)
That statement is what lead to everything.
If you would of replied after that in any way to acknowledge that rape happens to men, and that women are capable of raping and that while it doesn't happen as often is fairly significant, there would be no disagreement instead of trying to marginalize it.
There was no twisting. If that wasn't what you meant, you simply mistated something and then offered no correction when called out on it.
