By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thranx said:

Like i said in 20 years the same will be said of global warming.

A prediction based on nothing.

thranx said:

Have you not noticed that it has already begun. With the new term being climate change.

The term "climate change" is not at all new. Here it is being used as far back as 1953:

https://books.google.com/books?id=5DPwAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142&dq=%22Solar+Variation+as+AN+Explanation+of+Climate+Change%22&source=bl&ots=NGFCjdxs5O&sig=LHOCBCNho7ihqmABx48PHyw9i0c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiko7nNs8PKAhUPymMKHfztDx4Q6AEILDAD#v=onepage&q=%22Solar%20Variation%20as%20AN%20Explanation%20of%20Climate%20Change%22&f=false

You can buy the pamphlet too:

http://www.abebooks.co.uk/SOLAR-VARIATION-EXPLANATION-CLIMATE-CHANGE-Bell/5861489741/bd

http://www.amazon.com/SOLAR-VARIATION-EXPLANATION-CLIMATE-CHANGE/dp/B00KJ1A172

thranx said:

If the science behind global warming/climate change is so sound why are the predictions so off? If they know what they are talking about, if the science is true, why can they not accuratly predict global temperature trends?

You're awfully vague: what predictions are you referring to and by whom?