By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Another silly notion I see throw here is more taxation and confiscation and caps.

If you put a law that anything over a certain amount will be totally seized them the people that make that money will just stop working after they get that. So let's say in March he reach his quota and decide to close the business until the next year, a lot of unemployment. Let's say you want to limit inheritance, they will find a way to spread, sell for under price and other mechanisms to transfer. Or you decide to make even more tax, they will move their wealth to place that don't have it. Or when you make it more expensive to produce and they go to cheaper countries.

People need to drink less kool-aid from their left wing teachers that think the thievery of the government is capable of solving problems by prohibiting riches from being rich.

And the best part I see on social defenders is that they aren't ashamed of having their richness, just that others should be for being richer... never saw my friends that preach a lot give their money or effectively help the poor, they just like to be the knight in the shining armor.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."