Can Feminists Get Any More Desperate?

[A_C_E]

o_O.Q said:

good and with that your argument collapses

My argument was never against this in the first place so explain how it has collapsed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

because of religion, the same religion that is allowing men to fight as women in ufc

http://www.advocate.com/sports/2014/09/22/ufc-womens-champ-refuses-fight-trans-athlete-fallon-fox

your religion is winning its changing society and it is having the desired impact of making people buy into the lie that men and women are the same

but that has nothing to do with science

Religion? It's because of science! Did you not read why these bans are being suspended?

I'm not saying you are one but you are talking like a legit conspiracy theorist. You seriously think society is changing because of people buying into a lie that men and women are the same? OK...

I'm not saying men and women are the same, I'm saying men and women can have the same psychological states. You put so much extremety into the context of what I'm saying, effectively blowing it out of proportion.

I'm not advocating the direction of response towards individuals I'm simply pointing something out. I have backed up my claims that women can have testosterone in the male range and you simply don't want to accept that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 i did acknowledge in the same sentence that it happens and said that it results in ambiguity with regards to gender, which is why people were banned to begin with

Bannings underwent through the approval of the IAAF due to the ambiguous nature of 'certain' female athletes. We all know transgender individuals exist but not all ambiguity leads to one conclusion. It's because of science that the bannings have been suspended since not all women who were banned are considered ambiguous.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think that in all your stupid assertions you are beginning to lose sight of what my argument was, which is that physiology and psychology are linked, but in doing that i acknowledged that exceptions do exist but ultiamtely we have to generalise to make sense of things

which is why i asked you if humans are a bipedal species which you agreed to... obviously even though there are cases where people are born with more legs we still default back to the generalisation when we discuss human beings as a group for obvious reasons

also you hilarious proved my point about the links between psychology and physiology more than once by yourself

Just because I point out that psychology and physiology interact with one another does not mean I have proved your point. I said that psychology and physiology are not linked in the manner that you proposed, but you are close enough and what you said is socially standard so I'm willing to see eye to eye. And speak for yourself, I don't have to generalize in order to make sense of things, that's how you end up with mixed results. But hey, in my eyes it's acceptable to generalize, just don't sell it as fact like this video does.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so what's your take on his question? since when have you seen a man have pms? i wasn't going to bother acknowledging such a stupid question because even though i've been replying to a lot i do have a limit and if this religion of yours has weakened your perception of reality that badly then there really is no point 

No there is no point if your best example is PMS (lol) since PMS is a syndrome that refers to emotional symptoms such as depression, food cravings, anxiety and stress to name just a few. All these are things that men psychologically experience on a constant basis.