By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
A_C_E said:
DonFerrari said:

Man, I just see you in a crazy spin. It's obvious that a man or woman may be more inteligent, rational, science orientated or any single indicator you want. But when you look on averages or pick extremes on the same side man and woman will have pronounced differences. But you want to pick opposite extremes and get a very small intersection to validate your points.

We have provided several differences in physical, homornes, brain activities and etc but you want to insist on a not proved notion that they basically have no interference on psychological (even if on real world those differences are very apparent, but then discredit then as social constructions).

I have accepted from the beginning the differences in physical nature, brain activity and that they do obviously have a psychological effect. How many times do I simply have to say that no psychological state is bound by sex.

Ok. So since you have accepted that the general psycological traits are gender biased (but I agree not bonded) why are you still discussing it? You are being unclear with o_0.Q on it. Because we already have agreed that there is some connection between body/brain/mind and gender, but there are deviations and fluctuations, but in macro vision we know what to expect from each side and that men/women are quite different even if they can even reverse.

o_O.Q said:
DonFerrari said:

Men can have PMS don't you know?

so what's your take on his question? since when have you seen a man have pms? i wasn't going to bother acknowledging such a stupid question because even though i've been replying to a lot i do have a limit and if this religion of yours has weakened your perception of reality that badly then there really is no point 

Why did you answered to me twice and in one time you recognized the sarcasm and in the second you didn't? I have no particular belief in god. My question was plainly answered and aknowledge by A_C_E and you both are barking in opposite directions and can't even see that you basically agree with most things but are having a difficult time perceiving it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."