Currently Online 
| Airaku said
First and foremost. I will apologise for taking a day to reply. I was at a seminar last night and I will not go into details on this. After all I would be called a liar. On the subject of lying. Personally it is the most insulting thing a person can say to me. Yet, you claim to be insulted that I hold doubts for you. I stated that you had an "inferiority complex" based on the assumption of the way you are stating your words to me, and how you seem to be quite argumentive in general from what I've observed. Just as you call me a liar through a basic assumption. I assumed by the fact you consistently call me a liar and my reluctance to admit to it, you were hinting at the idea that I was a pathological liar. I do not see you admitting to your faults. Perhaps I should be using the word assumption more in context while speaking to you. I continue to go off topic, because you continue to do the same. After all. Even you stated that this conversation should be directly related to Mass Effect 3. Regarding to the leaks online. About a year ago a website know as AGB released a very lengthy detailed outline in the shape of a press release regarding Mass Effect Andromeda. It is far more in-depth than the links you provided me. They also leaked Dragon Age Inquisition well in advance. I would suggest looking on that site, they do not have a search function and you'll need to hit the back button a lot. Easily a hundred times. I'm not going through that effort for you after the tones that I find quite disrespectful. The information is indeed out there. I can also tell you right now that the person who leaked DA is no longer at the Edmonton studios and is now at Bioware Montreal. That is the studio who is now helming the next chapter in the Mass Effect series, while the main studios in Edmonton is working hard on the new IP. Thank god that the leaker is gone.
By that definition I have not lied, however! "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression." I fully admit that I did the above. I could also alter the number to 8 right now. Unfortunately I do not consider saying hello as a sufficient reason. I also do not count the 4 guys I met at an Expo one time. Really? Want me to go to 12? Blasphemy! So yes. I could have raised that number again without lying. But it would have been dishonest in a way that would be a great deal to myself. I am disappointed enough to raise the number. For example the conversation with Trent, who went on to form Beamdog, said next to nothing about the Mass Effect series. He was very focused on the Baluder's Gate franchise and, if I remember right, Neverwinter Nights. Beamdog remains committed to spiritually continuing the Baulder's Gate series. So yes, it was "deceptive" of me to add him to the number. I figure, what the hell. It was more dishonesty, than a lie, as communication with a Bioware founder who's been there since the beginning is true. I twisted the meaning as a double meaning. Communication on Mass Effect was deceptive. Indeed I have had conversations regarding Mass Effect and it's development. I have very good reasons for being hesitant for going into details in these matters. This should be blantly obvious to you and yes I have been dodging the reason as to why, I will continue to do so. From where I stand. I gave this information to people who wanted to hear or learn something regarding the game. I am glad to know that I didn't waste my time, and I am sorry that you disagree and continue to disagree. That is fine with me. Of course you'll twist the knife with that, but really. At this point it's a lost cause imho. On another subject of a lie. I could faithfully call you a liar right now. You claim to "not care". No one in their right mind will go through the effort if they didn't care. You make lengthy replies and dedicate time to this, therefore you care. I do the same, therefor I care. This really doesn't get any simpler. Does it feel good to know that you fall under definition 1 as that was likely intentional, under my own assumption. Rather than "deceptive" as I fully admit to doing, and have done so when I explained my "marketing" bullshit comparison to make myself look better. Again, very very simple concept. No explanation should be required. I can clearly tell that you don't know how a theme works, or is dictated in the gaming industry from a developers point of view. I stand corrected in this matter. Perhaps in the field that you work in, it takes a different point of view. A theme is dictated by the base foundation for which the game is developed on. In gaming a theme is often the derives around the concept and idea of the gameplay that leads into the story. Yes it is true that with Bioware the story comes first. I will admit this. However a lot is changed in the course of the development of their games to fit the idea and concept. Which is the base theme the game is focused around. It is often an idea that can be summed up even on a napkin and then evolves as development progresses. All of these concepts are first used in a "prototype", which is a stage before Alpha. Trust me, this stuff is nothing to look at, it's laughable and may even make one puke. Infact the story isn't even there, only a base guideline which supports the intentional theme of the original vision and message the developers wish to convey to the audience. In this case, what I stated about theme from a developer point of view is correct. I still stand by this claim and will continue to do so until you prove me wrong in such a manner. There is tons of story in a Bioware game. Lot's of messages, side quests and stories for the gamer to engage in, some of it is quarterbacking (I will explain this if you do not know the term), luckily Bioware tries to lay low on this, DA is a bad example of where it failed. In Mass Effect the concept of Synthetic and Organics arguably spreads through almost everything. Through that Unity and Galactic peace became major themes. Which is supported and glued together by the idea, the base concept, and reoccurring (main) theme of the game. It's the needle and thread of the series. I am sorry if you were unable to get this, but that was the message and intention of the developer. It's what they wanted to convey to their audience. I personally think they did a good job at it. From your perspective, they did a poor job.
1) Metroid Prime, Elderscrolls, Myth
|
First and foremost. I will apologise for taking a day to reply. I was at a seminar last night and I will not go into details on this. After all I would be called a liar.
Again, why do I care? Allow me to say, I do not care at all about where you were last night. I don't know why you brought it up, or why you think I care enough to question it. Why you feel the need to make a point that you were at a seminar is beyond me.
To deflect criticism, you're trying to portray it like I'm just calling you out on everything you said, but I'm not. Only on claims that have a direct bearing on the theme of Mass Effect. So, stop it with the childish whining.
On the subject of lying. Personally it is the most insulting thing a person can say to me.
Then... you know... stop lying maybe? I have no idea why you're so intent on proving to me that you are not lying, but your wonky explanations and ridiculous assertions aren't helping you.
Yet, you claim to be insulted that I hold doubts for you.
Yes, because I've not given any reason to suggest that I am lying. When you accused me of lying, I showed evidence that I was not. And, it would be a classy move to acknowledge that evidence and admit you were wrong to challenge me. Just saying.
I stated that you had an "inferiority complex" based on the assumption of the way you are stating your words to me, and how you seem to be quite argumentive in general from what I've observed. Just as you call me a liar through a basic assumption. I assumed by the fact you consistently call me a liar and my reluctance to admit to it, you were hinting at the idea that I was a pathological liar. I do not see you admitting to your faults.
Allow me to clear up this misconception...
I am absolutely argumentative. Which has nothing to do with an inferiority complex. Feel free to show me any evidence that this is usually a sign of that.
As for why I am talking to you the way I am, it is because I don't have much tolerance for dishonesty or being insulted. It is also a big pet peeve of mine when people make claims without evidence.
This is going to sound like a dick thing to say, and I'm sure it is, but, I cannot fake respect or feign politeness. At this point, I do not feel the need to grant you any more respect than is mandated by the forum rules. It it makes you happy, you can consider that a fault that I have admitted.
But why should I need to admit to any faults? Is this a group therapy session? Whatever my faults are, they have no bearing on the theme of Mass Effect. Your honesty however, directly relates to this topic, because you claim to have special informaiton about the game.
And I'm calling you a liar because you've lied on a number of points. Talking to people at Bioware, presenting public information as if it was insider info, calling me a jackass and claiming it's not an insult (if you insist it's not, then I'll just call you a jackass tthe rest of this conversation) that I'm dodging questions, that I would never see you bragging, and that I'm not providing evidence.
Perhaps I should be using the word assumption more in context while speaking to you. I continue to go off topic, because you continue to do the same. After all. Even you stated that this conversation should be directly related to Mass Effect 3.
Lol. EVERYTHING I've said has been a direct response to you. I have not been introducing new topics to this conversation. And, whenever I ignore your irrelevant drivel, you accuse me of "dodging" questions. So, if this is off topic, it is entirely your fault.
Regarding to the leaks online. About a year ago a website know as AGB released a very lengthy detailed outline in the shape of a press release regarding Mass Effect Andromeda. It is far more in-depth than the links you provided me. They also leaked Dragon Age Inquisition well in advance. I would suggest looking on that site, they do not have a search function and you'll need to hit the back button a lot. Easily a hundred times. I'm not going through that effort for you after the tones that I find quite disrespectful. The information is indeed out there. I can also tell you right now that the person who leaked DA is no longer at the Edmonton studios and is now at Bioware Montreal. That is the studio who is now helming the next chapter in the Mass Effect series, while the main studios in Edmonton is working hard on the new IP. Thank god that the leaker is gone.
If this leak is information that I could find myself through the website, then why did you present it as proof that you were telling the truth? Why did you tell to print the screen and that "evidence may come later but better late than never"? You presented it as information that you personally obtained. Which is yet another lie.
And, btw, it took me about two seconds to find the link to the AGB leak. Don't have a search engine? You know google exists right? Both that and the Dragon Age Inquisition link came from surveys that were issued to people outside of the company. There was no "leaker" within the company.
So your claim that "the person who leaked DA is no longer at the Edmonton studios is again, a lie. And by this point, yes I am absolutely convinced you are a pathological liar.
The traits of a pathological liar include.
The most telltale sign is the commitment to the lie. Any rational truthful person would by this point just have thought "oh this guy doesn't believe me. Oh well." Yet despite my constantly telling you "either drop it or prove it and I won't say anything about it", instead you just keep piling on more and more. "Oh it was actually at least 8 people. And I spoke to so and so at a convention. Oh and I could confirm this comment... and that comment, oh and I know the movements of each worker at Bioware." Why would any rational person KEEP making these claims when I OBVIOUSLY don't believe them. What is to be gained?
So you don't want to be called a liar? Let me show you how! It's really simple, and I've told you how about 10 different times. It's a simple three step process. Before you say anything else, ask yourself these basic questions.
1. Is this related to Mass Effect or the issue of an author's authority?
2. Can I actually demonstrate that this is true?
3. Am I willing to provide the evidence that shows this is true?
If the answer to any of these questions is "no" then just don't say it. If you follow these steps, I can guarantee that I will never ever call you a liar. And, if you follow steps 2 and 3 I can nearly guarantee that NOONE will EVER call you a liar. It's soooooo simple.
I fully admit that I did the above. I could also alter the number to 8 right now. Unfortunately I do not consider saying hello as a sufficient reason. I also do not count the 4 guys I met at an Expo one time. Really? Want me to go to 12? Blasphemy! So yes. I could have raised that number again without lying. But it would have been dishonest in a way that would be a great deal to myself. I am disappointed enough to raise the number. For example the conversation with Trent, who went on to form Beamdog, said next to nothing about the Mass Effect series. He was very focused on the Baluder's Gate franchise and, if I remember right, Neverwinter Nights. Beamdog remains committed to spiritually continuing the Baulder's Gate series. So yes, it was "deceptive" of me to add him to the number. I figure, what the hell. It was more dishonesty, than a lie, as communication with a Bioware founder who's been there since the beginning is true. I twisted the meaning as a double meaning. Communication on Mass Effect was deceptive. Indeed I have had conversations regarding Mass Effect and it's development. I have very good reasons for being hesitant for going into details in these matters. This should be blantly obvious to you and yes I have been dodging the reason as to why, I will continue to do so.
You said that you talked to "precisely" 7 people at Bioware about Mass Effect's theme. So, increasing the number above 8, or including anyone that you didn't talk to about Mass Effect would in fact be a lie.
If you have such a low standard of integrity that you don't see what you've been doing as lying, then fine. I really don't care how you rationalize your dishonesty. "I was deceptive and dishonest, but I did not lie". Lol. Ok Bill Clinton. All I care about is that you stop making the claim. Can you prove it to me? If not, I don't care what the reason is. Just drop it entirely.
. Infact the story isn't even there, only a base guideline which supports the intentional theme of the original vision and message the developers wish to convey to the audience. In this case, what I stated about theme from a developer point of view is correct. I still stand by this claim and will continue to do so until you prove me wrong in such a manner.
No, that is not how it works at all. Someone who is so scientific should understand this.
When YOU make a claim it is YOUR job to justify it. When I said I had a master's degree, you doubted me. And, while it was a dick move in a social context, you were absolutely correct to doubt me from a debate standpoint. This was MY claim, so if I expect you to believe it, it was MY job to justify it. And I did.
I didn't say "I stand by the fact that I have a Master's Degree and will continue to do so until you prove me wrong in such a manner." Nor have I done this for any other claims.
Now, YOU are making a claim, so I will hold YOU to the same standards you held me to. This is YOUR claim. It is YOUR job to prove it. Can you show me any source to show that this is an accepted definition of theme in the game industry? If not, then your claim does not stand.
You claim to be scientific. This should not be a foreign concept to you.
On another subject of a lie. I could faithfully call you a liar right now. You claim to "not care". No one in their right mind will go through the effort if they didn't care. You make lengthy replies and dedicate time to this, therefore you care. I do the same, therefor I care. This really doesn't get any simpler. Does it feel good to know that you fall under definition 1 as that was likely intentional, under my own assumption. Rather than "deceptive" as I fully admit to doing, and have done so when I explained my "marketing" bullshit comparison to make myself look better. Again, very very simple concept. No explanation should be required.
No, because, yet again. It was not an intentional lie, or even a lie of any kind. It was just you again showing a total lack of reading comprehension.
"I don't care at all if you're a liar. Whatever you do outside of this conversation is your business. The only reason I brought up you lying is when you lied about something that is not relevant to the debate or if you told lies about me."
I never said that I didn't care about this topic. I actually said that I enjoyed debating, and care about defending my views. I clearly indicated that I found whether or not you lied relevant in the context of this conversation, which is why I addressed it, and that outside of the context of this conversation, I didn't care. I said that to hopefully end your incessant whining and your pathetic attempts to convince me you weren't lying.
Either you are deliberately misrepresenting what I said, or simply cannot read effectively. I don't really care which, but you're wrong and you should probably apologize for calling me a liar.
Now I'm going to ask you to ask a few questions this time around. If you can answer ALL of these correctly, then I will concede in this argument and admit you are right. Just remember that themes in gaming is very different than you may expect. I am asking for the base theme, most which is decided before the proto-type phase. I doubt this will be a challenge for you. Some of them can be reoccurring themes, none the less they are themes, and without understanding these themes you will not see success in the gaming industry. You will fall flat on your face. By the way. If any one answers before you, it's a bust, so please let JWeinCom plead his case.
1) Metroid Prime, Elderscrolls, Myth
2) Metal Gear Solid, Call of Duty, Age of Empires
3) System Shock, Silent Hill, Bioshock
4) Mirrors Edge, Assassin's Creed, Dying Light
5) God of War, No More Heroes, Soldier of Fortune
6) Grand Theft Auto, Twisted Metal, Gran Turismo
7) Uncharted, Resident Evil, Tomb Raider
8) Fire Emblem, The Legend of Zelda, The Witcher
9) Dues Ex, Remeber Me, Snatcher
10) Castlevania, Lunar Knights, BloodRayne
11) Zone of Enders, Armor Core, Ranger X
12) Advent Rising, Mass Effect (This ones gets 2 because it's a rare theme and Halo counts, but is not a core theme)
13) Watch Doges, Batman Arkham Games, True Crime
14) The Order of 1886, Kid Icarus, Altered Beast
15) Audiosurf, Brutal Legend, Rock Band
Good luck. You got 15 shots. Some are tricky but I gave you a few simple freebies. Get them all right and you rest your case. If you get half of them right, I'll give you some credit, and even respect. I'm more than happy to share the answers if you give a fair attempt to all of them, you may even learn something about game development.
Go on. Spin those wheels xD :)
TWIIIIIIIIX!
Just let me say. The only two points I really care about are
a) the theme of Mass Effect.
b) Whether or not an author's extratextual claims should be taken as absolute.
1. How can we tell if an author's comments about their work are wrong? If what the author says disagrees with the actual text, which do we accept?
2. Whether or not you talked to someone at Bioware , there should still be evidence in the games themselves that organics vs synthetics is the main theme. Right?
3. Following # 2, do you have any evidence that, from BOTH a design and literary perspective, organics vs synthetics is the main theme? Prove this, using evidence from the games.
4. Should people accept claims without any sort of evidence? If they should not, why do you keep insisting I should believe your claims?
These four questions that you ignored several times now are laser focussed on the original topic. They are asking you DIRECTLY to address the theme of Mass Effect and the issue of an author's authority.
I have a feeling you might use my refusal to play your stupid game as a reason to not answer these, so you have my absolute word that I will do that if you give straightforward answers to these questions. It won't prove anything about Mass Effect, but I will.
