bouzane said:
Nem said:
The way you mix up social support as "fascism" or an "dictatorship" or even "corporatism" is distasteful at best. You obviously were fed some really weird stories with some big words to make you think it was right.
I will tell you what i tell every right wing defender. The state isnt "alive", people are. When you are willing to let people die for economic growth is when your priorities are in the wrong place.
|
I understand that English isn't your first language but there is no excuse for replying to my post without first understanding it. If you do not understand a term (in this case corporate subsidies) please learn what it means before you discuss it with other people. I am not making any sort of comparison between social security and fascism. My entire post reiterates this fact over and over and somehow you misinterpreted what I said yet again.
I am drawing comparisons between unconditionally handing the peoples' wealth over to private entities to corporatist-fascism because that's exactly what it is. Corporate subsidies are not social security, what is so damn difficult about this concept? I have said nothing against communism, socialism or social security. I am speaking out against corporate subsidies because they reallocate wealth (unfairly I might add) from the lower and middle classes to the extremely wealthy. Your comment about "weird stories with some big words" leads me to believe that you geniunely do not have any grasp of what I am saying so why bother to respond to me at all? Please understand what I am posting before you respond again.
If this was too long or too difficult to follow I'll break it down for you:
1) I am in favor of social security
2) I have never compared social security to fascism
3) I despise the right wing and have done literally nothing to defend it
4) I am neither a supporter of authoritarianism nor statism
5) At no point have I expressed a desire to allow people to die for economic growth
If you do not read and / or understand what I have posted then please stop replying to me. You are not addressing anything I have said but instead some imaginary strawman. You are making up things that I have never said and that is extraordinarily disrespectful. No offense but posts like yours are the reason I despise participating in any actual discussions on this forum. I can handle somebody disagreeing with me, it's this complete lack of comprehension that I can not tolerate.
If your next reply is just more nonsense about positions I have never taken, opinions I have never expressed and more misunderstanding of basic socio-economic concepts then I am just going to ignore it. Put more effort into this discussion or I am finished wasting my time on you.
|
Chillax. It was a language barrier thing like you said. I apologise for the mixup. Thought you were saying something else, and i'm happy that wasnt the case. Very happy to be wrong in this case. :)
