| MTZehvor said: As it pertains to contests or measuring of equality, yes, it does. For instance, people got upset at the Patriots when they were accused of deflating footballs. Why? Because it (supposedly) put them at an advantage that others teams didn't start off with. People argue that the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision makes campaigning "unfair" for less wealthy candidates because they can't afford to advertise themselves as much, and are at a disadvantage from the get go. That's the issue at stake here, and that's really what fairness is all about. If you've got a different idea of what fair means, then feel free to throw it out there. I agree that having better or worse circumstances is a part of life, but that doesn't make the concept of fairness any less valid. It just means that life isn't fair, which, coincidentially, is a commonly enough heard phrase that I think it drives the point home. |
My idea of "fair" is pertaining to adhering standards or rules ...
Life is one shitty game that involves some luck whether you like it or not ...
You can only argue about fairness on the grounds of misconduct for a very small set of variables ...
Nothing is ever equal in life but that doesn't mean it's not fair. The rules for it makes sense to great degree ...
