By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 17 January 2016
Edit Thread
Thunderbird77 said:
DonFerrari said:
Thunderbird77 said:

They paid for exclusivity on something that wouldn't be exclusive otherwise. How is that not a moneyhat?

Please show us the evidence. Or stop saying the same baseless speech.

You're saying it would be exclusive if sony hadn't paid for it?

Nope, I'm asking for the proofs that make you be so certain it would release this year and Sony bought it to be exclusive, but kept it on PC. Several games in the past, present and future were exclusives to Sony without Sony having to pay for it. So please show us the evidence.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."