Here's another source from the original alleged occurance:
"In a harrowing group of messages, the New York anti-rape campaigner said she was attacked by ‘Shakir’ after agreeing to have a shower with him, because the water in her own room was cold."
“I went back to my old hostel to leave a note for a friend, Nick. There was another guy there, Shakir, who was desperately trying to get with me."
“I kissed him once but he seemed drunk so I told him it was bad timing, I had already met someone. Before heading out, I went upstairs to say hi to one more friend, Clyde from the states. “Shakir followed me upstairs and said he was going to take a shower."
“He invited me to join. I said yes because the water at my current hostel is pretty cold and after 2 days of being sick, I just really wanted a hot shower. As soon as I got in the bathroom, he forced me to my knees. I said ‘stop!’, but he just got more violent.”
In short, she willingly kissed a drunk guy who desperately wanted to hookup with her, agreed to take a shower with him, and the rest happens. If Clyde, her friend, was actually there, why didn't she ask to use his shower instead taking a shower with a drunk stranger?
Anyone else sense the lack of basic reasoning in the choices that were made? Call me a cynic but I still think it never actually happened and it was staged for media propaganda.
