| DonFerrari said: Didn't disagree on it, just said that considering the level of hormones and reduced analytical capabilities even if someone had proof that asked to stop and the other kept going I doubt any jury would convict the first as a rapist. It isn't a grey area, but it's medical fact that the person isn't on a situation that he can properly judge his actions. |
Maybe that person should not have sex if he/she can't control his/her hormones. That temporary insanity is used for murder cases is bad enough, now also for rape cases? Are people really that bad at controlling their hormones.
Interestingly killing your rapist is sometimes considered justifiable homicide, if you kill the person after the rape has initiated yet before it is over... How the heck do you proof that.
