DonFerrari on 15 January 2016
| kowenicki said: FFS. CLEALY the author of the article was using efficiency in relation to the spend per ad. Is it an efficient use of money in relation to size of brand, sales that result length of ad, type of ad, demographic hit....? no fucker knows so its funny people here are trying to say it is efficient within one of those metrics. Lighten up. Not everything is an attack on your company of choice you know. Its like 2005 all over again. |
One of the worst use of "efficiency" I may have ever saw.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
