By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 15 January 2016
Edit Thread
SWORDF1SH said:
GribbleGrunger said:

I wasn't doubting Amazons accuracy to predict the winner. Why would I predict a 200k - 250k lead for the PS4 if that was the case? I was just saying Sony missed a trick on Amazon, although I did acknowledge the idea more people may well go to bricks and mortar stores. I still called a win based on Amazon and so obviously trusted Amazon's track record, but I reduced the gap from 300k - 350k because of the later performance of the Gears Bundle. Sony missed a trick and should have had a bundle to compete with it for the second half of the month. They relied entirely on the Star Wars brand but clearly (on Amazon) price won the day when people had no other choices.

Don you know the rules, source or it didn't happen :p

I won't be arsed to look at 1200 comments, and I could conceed him the victory, but you know the truth



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."