By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GribbleGrunger said:
DonFerrari said:

Maybe alzheimer is getting to you, but you were doubting Amazon capacity to predict, based on PS4 still being ahead even when it got up in price... then after you saw the GAFers saying that PS4 was doing good on other retailers you gone back to believe... you were saying that because of the risk of not getting the gift for christmas None would buy their console online for the heatest week of the year and thus we couldn't believe the ranks to predict the winner... and when you come back to believe in it you just cut your gap prediction.

I still said the PS4 would win based on what we saw on Amazon. I just reduced the gap because I think Sony could have competed better towards the end of the month. It seems to me that I was right to reduce the gap.

On gap reduction yes (although we can't confirm if your reasons to reduct reflect on RL occurences). But accept that you were doubting Amazon Accuracy. I'm sure Badley, Shadow and Insipid will remember it too.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."