Can Feminists Get Any More Desperate?

[o_O.Q]

A_C_E said:

o_O.Q said:

look the point i was making here is that if someone is producing less testosterone than a woman then they will not develope into a man because the male sex hormone is needed for a man to develope physiologically

what evidence do you have that there are men that exist with less testosterone than women because this completely goes against what we know about biology?

I have lots of proof that testosterone on its own is not sufficient enough for the male to develop into a male, are you kidding me? lol

"the amount of testosterone does not dictate whether a man is a man"

so since women have testosterone too why don't they develop the same way as men? please explain this one for me

 

"Your fire analogy was not one to show the effects of testosterone physically but instead was used to describe what would happen mentally"

as i said and you agreed, physiology and psychology are linked

yes it causes more aggression as a psychological effect but it also causes physiological effects... as i've been saying over and over again there is no dividing line between both

 

"do you even know the effects of testosterone"

i have to ask the question because from your claims its obvious that you don't know how these things work and therefore before you try to speak on them it would be best to go and read up on them

 

" why it would be better to look at an individual as an individual"

ironically it is the beliefs you are pushing that are grounded in a desire to erase individuality, but for some reason you can't see it

Psychology and physiology are not linked in the manner that you are proposing, two completely different engines when you put testosterone into the mix as well. I was pointing out that both fields could be used in conversation at the same time since testosterone affects both, not that both act in the same way, and you seem to purposfully misjudge these notions and fit them into your imaginary puzzle.

Ok lets just stop here because we are literally going in circles of you asking silly questions and me answering them never in the way you like.

-edit- Which is not to say I think you're below me because I don't think that way at all, I just get the feeling this conversation is going nowhere, blame that on me all you want.

 

"I have lots of proof that testosterone on its own is not sufficient enough for the male to develop into a male, are you kidding me?"

this is what i said " the male sex hormone is needed for a man to develope physiologically" how does this translate to saying only testosterone is needed?

why are you incapable of reasoning things out?

 

"so since women have testosterone too why don't they develop the same way as men? please explain this one for me"

why did you skip my question? since women also possess testosterone why do they not develope into men?

 

"Psychology and physiology are not linked in the manner that you are proposing"

well prove that this is not the case instead of just asserting it... i can assert that the moon is made of cheese doesn't mean that its true

so far all you've succeeded in doing is demonstrating that you don't really know what any of these things mean and here are you are trying to school people on it

 

" I was pointing out that both fields could be used in conversation at the same time since testosterone affects both, not that both act in the same way"

i sincerely do not comprehend what you are trying to say here

 

"fit them into your imaginary puzzle."

lol oh so i'm the person who isn't in touch with reality? lol ok buddy

 

"Which is not to say I think you're below me because I don't think that way at all"

yes i remember your heart warming proclamation from before... you are definitely a more "moral" person than i am for sure