By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:

II see, even if she suppress his name and face?

Yeah because it can still lead back to him, it's a highly sensitive issue that can't be taken lightly for either party.

Ok, that is a possible point and she would be silly to use it publicaly even if he is tried and found guilty because he could still sue her for all the loses to his image her exposition is making.

SpokenTruth said:
DonFerrari said:
SpokenTruth said:

The mere fact you have to ask this question is why we still need awareness campaigns.

No means no.  

I'm asking him because of his analogy... because if you are about to finish your food and say you don't want anymore you can't return and not pay it.

Fair point. 

I do find it's pretty hard to happen (unless there was a injury during the act)  but could and it would be better to be with someone you care and would understand... but even though we can say it's rape in some interpretation during sex, close to ejaculation you aren't in the best of your judgement to put a harsh judgment on someone that kept going... but the analogy was just bad.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."