Nem said:
What a ridiculous thing to say, when the market isn't given a choice even. Lol at "preference" once more tough. If by preference, you mean a worse game, then sure, have it your way. Its no lie that the majority doesn't care, but again, doesn't mean they are right. Actually, they aren't even counsciously making a decision on it. |
Eeehhh...for one, you're not using short sighted correctly.
Besides that, would Halo or Forza be worse at 30 fps? Yeah. Would Fallout 4 or The Witcher be worse at 60 fps? Yeah, probably.
Games like that are largely about their scope and how alive there world feels. The kind of sacrifices it would take to achieve that would hinder the developers efforts.
Also, the market is absolutely given a choice. You want 60 fps games? Stop buying 30 fps games. The market has a choice, it's just that the people who hold draconian views on fps don't have the fortitude to see it through.
Actually, if you are interested in games that focus on performance over visuals, try VR...oh, wait...
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.







