A_C_E said:
I have already stated that men are much more likely to produce more testosterone than women, I have never argued against this and have actually already agreed with it for obvious reasons. Why keep coming back to something that almost all people already know? There is nothing special about saying men have more testosterone than women and it proves nothing other than men may act more aggressively because of the higher amounts of testosterone. How many times do I have to agree with this? Of course men have more testosterone but if your still arguing with me then maybe you don't quite understand my claims, maybe that is my fault, I can admit but I feel as though I have been pretty good on acknowledging the differences between men and women. My claim is that psychology is not bound by what sex you are, literally that simple. How is this overlapping my points? |
Nope. Your fault is denying that the hormones have an effect of physicological aspects of woman and man and saying that is because both produce it in some way.
And yes most of the emotions (but no pre-menstrual issues) could be produced by either gender... but why a set of them is more common on men or women? And why men and women have different inclinations and interests? Guess why, because they are different.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."