Nem said:
You read too much into my words. Besides, arent you the one of the ones defending that every game should look like the Order the the first place? I'm saying i don't want that. I do think that every game benefits from 60fps. If you don't agree with that go ahead. But its not a technical disagreement its a "i dont care that much about perfectly responsive and immediate gameplay versus more shinies". So, its not like you don't know 60fps is better, you just don't care. |
Nope, I didn't say every game should look like the Order, I didn't even say that I would only play or value games that look like it.
But you said like only 60fps are worth... Every game is a matter of resources... So if a game can be 1080p30fps or 720p60fps more times I'll choose the first option. And if a game would be 1080p60fps it probably is cutting on other IQ itens. I will choose what I preffer based on the intended game, several times 60fps doesn't matter, and how do we know that? We have been playing 30fps games without much hassle in diverse genres for several gen. But sure, you must know the prefference for everyone and how much better 60fps is that no one can play bellow it or think the gain is negible and preffer the resources are used in other places, and because of that your rule should be definitive and everyone need to adhere.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







