Can Feminists Get Any More Desperate?

[o_O.Q]

A_C_E said:

o_O.Q said:

"Why purposefully misrepresent what I'm saying?"

what misrepresentation? you said there are no psychological differences and i gave one example of why that is wrong

There is no pshychological difference between the sexes, it all depends on the individual. All points in the brain are the same for male and female. Any psychology claim that a female can make is the same possible psychological claim that a male can make. And don't give me examples of pregnant women please, I've already got a response for that kind of arguement. A females neurons are ported through axons to the same areas as they are in males. Some females, on average, end up porting more to the amygdala than the average male but that doesn't make females psychologically different when it all works in the EXACT same fashion. You can say women's psyche is different than men all you like, their brain is still working in the EXACT same fashion as a males brain.

 

"You honestly believe I don't know about the effects of testosterone and aggression? "

lol well if you do then why are we having this conversation?

Because you misrepresented me lol...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"women have testosterone as well!"

yes in comparatively small quantities which is why it is well known in society that men are comparatively more aggressive and ascertive on average

This does not negate that women have testosterone which was exactly my point that women's bodies are made up of and work the exact same way as a male's body 99% of the time. You could go ahead and list all the different placements of body parts and fluids and chemicals you like, but you will only be listing less than 0.5% of the female anatomy/cell structure/psyche. You pick.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I have never said I would call my female friends over to help me move."

its what we call a hypothetical situation... i used it as an example to demonstrate that there are situations where we automatically assume men are more capable than women and that is for a very very obvious reason

Better answer - I would call whoever I wanted to hang out with, whether that's women or men depends on my mood or who's available.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

" If you think men are above women because men are better at basketball "

its hilarious that you can talk of misrepresentation ( which i have not done ) when you post this nonsense... who said any gender was above the other? go back and find me any example of me saying that shit i beg you

Hence the 'if', sorry but when you make it sound as though no one would call a girl up to help them move when it happens all the time then...I think it's justified. You should be thankful that I even put 'if' in there.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You see, because I have morals, I am willing to accept women, blacks, hispanics, etc. as socially capable people."

that truly warms my heart it really does but its irrelevant and i hope you aren't saying here that i don't accept women because i acknowledge that they are different to men? because if that is your implication here then again you are wrong

Not my implication at all and I wouldn't stoop so low as to imply that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

you haven't at any point here disproven my claim all you've really done as most people like you do is try to assume the so called moral high ground and it simply amazes me how people don't see the strings that are causing them to dance

I don't think you understand just how scientific my definitions are. I am pointing out that a persons capability is structured towards, but not limited to, a persons sex. This style of thinking engages the proponents of an individuals capabilities as opposed to the ever recycled 'battle of the sexes' cliche. The notion that women can't do what men do or that men can't do what women do is an arguement you have already brought up when you asked me, "Who wold you call to help you move, a guy or a girl"...what a question to highlight your bias.

 

"You can say women's psyche is different than men all you like, their brain is still working in the EXACT same fashion as a males brain."

 

you already stated that you understand the effect of testosterone meaning that you understand that it is responsible for the increased aggression in men men... how do you account for this if men and women are the same? do you not consider increased aggression to be a behavioral trait?

and besides that if men and women are pretty much the same why is this ad directed towards men specifically as if men are in fact different? as if it takes into account that men are more sexually predatory?

what i should probably ask you first of all though is if you even understand what the psychological aspects of a person are because i'm starting to believe that you can't, not with the contradictory things you are posting

 

"Because you misrepresented"

it would be great if you could provide an example i can actually provide two examples where you misrepresented me 

 

"This does not negate that women have testosterone which was exactly my point that women's bodies are made up of and work the exact same way as a male's body 99% of the time. "

 

here's a thought experiment for you i want you to go outside and light a fire and when you have done so toss a small scrap of paper on it, then take a large heap of paper and toss those on.... notice a difference?

well what you are trying to argue now and i honestly cannot believe that you are posting this is that larger amounts or concentrations of hormones have no impact on the body or behavior which is to be blunt a stupid argument

 

"Not my implication at all "

so why go on that truly heart warming tirade about how you accept people of different races and sexes? it was obviously to present contrast to someone you believe to be the opposite and if i'm wrong please tell me what the purpose of posting that was

 

"The notion that women can't do what men do or that men can't do what women do is an arguement you have already brought up "

 

hey how many men have you ever observed giving birth? none? really? no way!... this is a very obvious example but there are significant differences between men and women both physically ( obviously )and behaviorally, i listed one major one above and i'm not going to bother with more because if you honestly can't see it then there really is no helping you - you would've allowed the narrative you've been provided to circumvent your ability to observe and make conclusions on this topic

 

".what a question to highlight your bias."

 

if you don't think you're biased then you are hopelessly naive... there is no person that exists that is free from bias, everytime someone tries to use that argument to paint the opposing argument as flawed i just cringe

now i'm going off on a limb here in saying from what i can tell you seek to be seen by others as a good moral person and fear with a passion someone thinking you are sexist and while that's all noble and great and stuff it is a control mechanism... a control mechanism that will take you further and further into dreamland... but i could be wrong here its just my speculation

if you really seek to better the world then it must be with the truth not feel good nonsense