I'm starting to think PS3 games aren't held to the standard that 360 games are. Official Xbox magazine gave GTA4 a 9.5 while the PS3 guys all got 10s. Dark Sector, Army of two, DMC4 and a few others are scoring from 5/10 to 7/10 on 360 but getting 8/10-10/10 on PS3? Seems weird. It's not a system bashing thread so just go put your thumb back in your ass if you aren't going to respond with some type of intelligent reply.
The question is: Do 360 owners have too high of expectations?
Are the PS3 versions of these games really that much better than the 360 versions? I don't think so. Most of the time we are reading how the "edge" goes to the 360 version. But why is a game like for example Army of Two getting a 5/10 in OXM and getting considerably higher reviews from other publications and critics such as Official Playstation Magazine? Are 360 owners so spoiled that they couldn't give a 10/10 to GTA4 because it might look better to say "It's a 10 on PS3 because they don't have any triple A games"?
The games are basically the same and consistently get lower scores on 360. It makes me think that the reviewers score games a little high on PS3 to help falsely hype games.
Are 360's critics expecting more out of the 360?
