| Jimbo1337 said: Have YOU been watching the election at all? You post a link and have ABSOLUTELY no clue what you are talking about. You quote something from an article that you probably just read moments before replying to my post. I honestly do not care that he has less donors that other candidates such as Bernie Sanders. You try to twist a positive into a negative any way that you can. He has small donors...this is a FACT. He does not accept money from big donors...this is a FACT. The fact that he has less small donors to Bernie Sanders signifies that he has needed/spent less money then their opponents. I mean is this that hard to understand? You are probably the only person on the face of this Earth that tries to twist that Trump has less small donors than Bernie Sanders into a negative. But instead of actually knowing what is going on, you just blurt out that he must be getting this money from big donors without actually knowing for sure. You then later find out, by someone like me, that this is his own money. Again, first read, then think, then type, mkay? No we do disagree on his sources for funding. I mention that his campagin is funded by small donations and not big donations. You then blurt out that he isn't self-funded, as if you are trying to do a "got you there" type moment. I then point out that this is in fact small donations by showing you that it was an average of 50 dollars per person, to which you then backpedal and try to sweep it under the rug. You then try to make it SEEM like he has big donors by pointing to this 20 million dollars on MEDIA, but I then point out that this is his own money. Let me guess, you are going to try to twist this into a negative when everything I have stated is a positive. Edit: Pst...by the way. The RNC isn't pushing Bush, but rather Marco Rubio. This again shows that you aren't paying attention to the election at all. I am sure it must be hard to follow the democratic debates when the last one aired during the Saturday before Christmas during a football game and the next one will air on the 17th (sunday) during two football games (playoffs). Man, the democratic party has some unfortunate luck on their scheduling. Who knew football games would be played at these times/days (sarcasm). |
You didn't read the article, as evidenced by you directly misquoting numbers from it. I already pointed out the relavance of all my citations is my previous post, which "you don't care about." Since you don't care about a logical explanation or what the article actually says and would rather use an ad hominem attack that relies on your assumptions that mean more to you because you dislike my logic (???), I have nothing further to say to you. Next time you start another rant, make sure it's not wholly dismissive and easily proved wrong: it's just obnoxious and a great way to wholly undermine your credibility.
By the way, since you've been so much more attentive to the election and know so much more about who's being endorsed (while I watch football?), aren't these articles about RNC candidate endorsements...peculiar:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/239559-2016-lawmaker-endorsements-for-president
