|
Actually these are the rules we are playing by, I stated it before and who gets to make the rules? This biased site. C'mon, I took over long ago. See I'm a veteran and have seniority. Windows 10 and Xbox One are Exclusive games, Splitting hairs is really just that and anyone on the outside world see's it this way to. Oh PS4 doesn't have it and it's on all current MS products, yes. Exclusive. |
I'm out. PC and XB1 or PS4 and PC, they have exactly the same value to you as the consumer who wants to buy a game that looks interesting. When it comes to the ability to physically play the game and where that is possible. That one is all Microsoft, doesn't make any difference if you own one of the little black boxes needed. You can't play games that are only available on XB1 but just owning an PC and visa versa. The console, whatever that may be, and Windows 10 are equally as separate when it comes to the exclusivity. That's what you would see from the outside world, the opposite of splitting hairs and a big obvious fact that you are trying very hard to make go away. I know why you're doing it, but to me it just seems pointless. I totally agree that a 'Microsoft exclusive' is a thing and because of the reasons spelled out above, that means literally nothing in a versus between the two consoles, and in a much wider sense.
When it comes to 'making rules', I should have made myself clearer I meant: "Sony has never owned those platforms. The facts haven't changed they have always been the same. And those aren't the rules we are playing by anyway." I feel the fact I used of 'rules' instead of 'facts' in the second sentence may have lead to some confusion of your part, and that was entirely my fault. You can't set a rule that goes against a fact, and hope to accomplish anything. I tell you all this as a back handed apology because when I read "See I'm a veteran and have seniority." I may have laughed, and shown some other people who frequent forums (there's not a lot to do here late on a Friday as you can see my how much i've typed) Obviously this is all in the public domain anyway and you typed it, but you may find that a little mean. So I guess, my thread, please don't be disruptive by trying to make anyone do anything. You can't, we don't have to, and I won't. As you can see. Feel free to make your own thread with any arbitrary rules you want.
Now that all may have been pointless (A) but it may not have been (B), which is why i'm not going to check back for an answer because i'd rather be in limbo than disappointed. Option A is that you know what i'm saying true but for some strange reason you have allegiance to a giant company and feel the need to defend it, or rather attack on it's behalf. This is because you want to convince others or more worryingly yourself and that you are right no matter what, which is you own problem and i'm not going anywhere near it. But either way none of this is anything new and you should definitely stop. Option B is that you owe me one because you've genuinely fallen for believing that 'Microsoft Exclusive' means something it clearly doesn't, it's pretty obvious too if you stop to think about it for a second and ignore their marketing department. Even if only nudged you in the right way towards a quiet realisation, I hope these two paragraphs have been worth it.
Buying order: Switch, better pc
