snyps said:
The reason I question his banking relationships is; As the front runner the pundits in the debates tried to corner him into swearing he would not run under a third party banner if he didn't get the nod.. They've never cornered a front runner like that before! Essentially they attempted to get the party to turn on him for a lack of loyalty to GOP. But he knew that if he fell for it he'd be surplanted and SOL.
The media is constantly attacking him, even Fox news. He never gets good coverage in the media. And who owns the media? Wall Street Banks.
The Banks control the Government just as much as the largest lobbyist AIPAC. All others (Conglomerates) with enough money to influence policy makers have to work channels under the Banks and AIPAC. So for a guy to position himself into mass popularity with out them is a threat to their dominance.
I know I'm just making up theories and it looks tin hat. These are just my crazy thoughts. I'm not voting for him or anyone else. It's just how it looks to me.
When Wallace asked about Donald Trump’s bankruptcies, the billionaire had these nice words to say about The Bank. ” … Trump Entertainment Resorts, which went bankrupt in 2009. In that case alone, lenders to your company lost over $1 billion and more than 1,100 people were laid off,” said Wallace. “Is that the way you’d run the country?” “Let me just tell you about the lenders,” responded Trump. “First of all, these lenders aren’t babies. These are total killers. These are not the nice, sweet little people that you think, okay?” |
I have a sneakign suspicion that the media financiers have invested heavily in Bush, Cruz, and Hillary. Hence, they've gone out of their way to deligitimize both Trump and Sanders. It's all about ROI for them.
