By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Nintyfan90 said:
CGI-Quality said:

-snip

I'll try. Its hard to ignore.

You didn't have to argue otherwise. Mentioning ps3 as your only source of proof was pathetic at best. Previous playstation consoles had best year after initial price cut is actually what I thought. Did ps4 not just do that?

It's only hard to ignore if your argument lacks strength.

Now as for what's "pathetic", I accept your view. I 100% disagree, of course, but no worries. I would like to see how you'd refute it with fact, though. And, regarding the PS4's price, it's the first time a PlayStation has only seen a $50 price slash as its first cut. So, we won't really know until the Summer, at least, of its potential impact.

Had it been a full drop to $299, no doubt, it would sit next to the PS3 as the "sweet spot" once more. Heck, it still could!

Nothing weak about my argument. Your argument is nothing but excuses really. $50 price cut excuse, 299.99 excuse why can't we just stick to reality. Ps4s first price cut is $50 so deal with it. We don't know when it will get to 299.99. If next year then no doubt it will sell more next year if not then it will run into market saturation. This price nonsense was used all Gen last Gen and ps3 never truly took off lol despite price cuts. It was suppose to crawl to 100 remember?