By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
binary solo said:
Wright said:


Or Square already got their pockets full with the MS deal and they didn't need a sales deadline for Tomb Raider this time. The question that remains, considering the game sold over one million units, is if it was profitable for Microsoft.

highly unlikely square got paid enough to make this game profitable for them after just 1 million in sales if all MS gets in return is just 3 month's total exclusivity and 1 year console exclusivity. If Square wanted to be profitable at 1 million in sales they would have needed to give MS permanent Xbox exclusivity. Not being profitable at 4 million in sales for the reboot means what, a cost to market of $180 million?  MS paid Square $140 million odd for a piddling 3 month's full exclusivity? I don't think so. MS might have money to throw around, but the execs aren't stupid with money. An investment still needs to at least theoretically make a financial case. And considering MS needed to go to considerable lengths to keep holiday sales flat year on year instead of down, for MS it seems like paying Square $50 million for this exclusivity deal would be financially questionable.

 

So I think a more realistic assumption is that MS optimistically hoped for about 3 million in game sales on Xbox, and MS paid Square the balance between 3 million in sales and break even. Which is probably about 2 million in sales. What that does is make Pc and PS 4 sales almost purely profit as long as Xbox sales reaches about 3 million, which it could possibly achieve wishbone decent start it's had.

 



 

I really wish we could know what Square was paid for this deal or just what deals like this are worth in general.