ganoncrotch said:
Don't forget that after Skyrim came ESO which they sunk an absolute ton of that cash pile into, another thing is that while I agree games should be tested, and of course Bethesda games go through tons and tons of testing before they're launched, I think a game world like Fallout 4 can't really be playtested 100%, because a dev can't really expect everything to happen which can be done in games which are so open world, I mean even with Skyrim last gen, I don't think there was 1 person who 100%'d that game without at least encountering 1 or 2 bugs... the only thing was not everyone encountered the same bugs, there was some more common than others, but no one ran into exactly the same issues in the same area's as other players, just because of the nature of the sandbox game that it is. Don't get me wrong btw, I love a game to be fully tested on launch, but at the same time, with a player base like bethesda games has the only way to find all the bugs that they will find by bugging into every wall they can while playing... is to release the game and let the players go nuts finding the bugs in it, some people (myself included) love finding funny bugs in those type of games, it's a large portion of the fun if you ask me. |
When they patch the 'performance issue' by just removing the shadow altogether instead of actually optimizing (That even modders did it on first month without modding tool.) There is no excuse. None.
Bethesda would have won for me if wasn't for Konami.
