theprof00 said:
Ok so I read the studies but I'm not sure they support entirely your insistence that I'm wrong. The studies showed that women are preferred among men in teaching positions of academic science. Additionally, it purported that the reason women only make up 20% of the field is because far fewer women enter the field than do men. Furthermore, none of the studies explained why the men chose women. Just that they did. Anyhoo, my objections notwithstanding, again, none of the listed articles actually counters what I said....simply that in one field, professors favor women over men. These aren't even the people that do the hiring, they're just professors.
|
So you count all professorships in STEM, across College, as one field? Slightly odd, but ok.
As far as the reasons for why men would hire women who take longer maternity, no clue, but you missed the part where women wouldn't, as in, the women doing the hiring would choose a different candidate if they showed a willingness to take longer maternity, you can theorize many things, could be sexism, but then, that'd also include the women who were choosing different candidates, would it not? Also missed? The part where neither female or male faculty members cared about male paternity leave. Now...that would be sexist, would it not? When you're using it as a criteria for women, it's supposed to be good enough for men, correct? Equality and all?
And yes, fewer women enter the field. Now, why is that? Sexism? Or, could women when given the choice, simply choose different paths? Or, could the absurd levels of 'THAR BE MISOGYNY THERE", that's hammered into the brains of every female growing up, turns them off? I dunno, I suppose if I were in their shoes, and every day the only thing I heard about science was how it's all men, they objectify women and treat them like shit...might make me choose a different path.
The studies do suggest that the entire story is not being told, however. And that there's quite clearly some bias in hiring among College faculty.