By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DonFerrari said:

You may want to recheck my post. I first asked why would very good games that Nintendo incentivize to go MP would still be exclusive, you avoided to answer. Then I asked if a great part were bad, didn't said all. And you still haven't answered or spoken the truth about it.

Probably because your question doesn't make much sense.   What do you mean by incentivizing them to go MP?  And does a "great part were bad" mean?

You said Nintendo were very vocal about they going multiplatform and I asked then why would the great games with selling potential be kept exclusive. You still haven't answered.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."