Wii u had 60 exclusives in 2015 while the PC had 19, PS4 and 12, and the Xbox One had 3.

[DonFerrari]

SpokenTruth said:

DonFerrari said:

SpokenTruth said:

DonFerrari said:

SpokenTruth said:

No doubt the arbitrary limitations and delineation lines drawn up by this story are bogus but so too is the suggestion that Nintendo contracts such exclusivity for indies.  It is in fact quite the opposite.  They've been pretty vocal about wanting indies to take their games to all platforms.

Why would any indie that have great evaluation would stay exclusive to Nintendo when Nintendo themselves say that they should release everywhere?

I think it is about Nintendo understanding that indies need as much exposure as possible for success compared to the big publishers where such deals can make sense. It isn't that they don't like having exclusive indie games but they realize it benefits those developers, the industry and makes it healthier overall.

I asked about the devs, why would those 50 avoid launching on other systems if Nintendo is incentivizing them? Is that because most of their games are very bad that it won't sell so they preffer to have some props by being exclusive?

Who said Nintendo was incentivizing them?  And do you feel like looking up Metacritic reviews for all of them and then comparing them with all other indie releases to verify your postulation that they are so bad that they need exclusive deals?

You said Nintendo is very vocal about wanting them to release for other platforms. No I won't look at the metacritic, it was stablished on the video and previous posts that they throwed ALL indies no matter the quality to get 60 games, and for PC they capped at mid tier. How many of the 50 indies have you bought seeing they are all quality titles on your perspective?