SpokenTruth said:
No doubt the arbitrary limitations and delineation lines drawn up by this story are bogus but so too is the suggestion that Nintendo contracts such exclusivity for indies. It is in fact quite the opposite. They've been pretty vocal about wanting indies to take their games to all platforms. |
Why would any indie that have great evaluation would stay exclusive to Nintendo when Nintendo themselves say that they should release everywhere?
Torillian said:
The video in question is looking at only true exclusives meaning that the game in that form (this allows collections of old games to count) does not appear on any other platform. Under those rules there seem to be 12 true exclusives on PS4 last year. |
Rules that were molded to favour the author opinion. "mid-tier PC exclusive... anything on WiiU (even if not exclusive)"
| ktay95 said: I actually cant believe this thread continued past my first post. Im disappointed in you VGChartz -__- |
You failed.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







