SpokenTruth said:
People have to understand that Sony was already a massive consumer electronics corporation back then. They had major retail, distribution, warehousing, wholesales, marketing, etc...all set up in Europe (and elsewhere) that a small company like Nintendo simply couldn't do. Better stated, Sony was set up to be successful in Europe before the PS even existed. That's not to take away what Sony accomplished, but to elaborate on why Nintendo never could replicate that even if they wanted to. |
Smaller company Sega done better than Nintendo in Europe as well... the always "small Nintendo" excuse can't excuse everything... a company that sells 150M DS and people excuse them having third party representatives in Brazil because they are too humble. I know smaller companies (that profit less than 100M yearly that export and develope more countries than Nintendo).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."