How Sony Is Smart To Stack Early 2016 With Exclusives Against Microsoft’s Empty Early 2016-

[Ali_16x]

Aura7541 said:

Ali_16x said:

Explain to me how that list is biased. I did include indies for PS4 but only the big ones, high budgets(for indies). Firewatch, The Witness, and No Man's Sky have fairly big budgets compared to a majority of indies. There is a lot of hype for these games. Darkest Dungeon is a really great indie that is available on Steam and has sold really well for an indie. The rest are Sony owned games.

If you have any games that fit that criteria, go ahead and post but I haven't seen any Xbox One indie that has a fairly big budget for an indie or one that people are looking forward too. And the reason I limited it to this criteria is because it would become a meanless list if I hadn't.

Street Fighter V is a big console exclusive that won't come to Xbox,  why wouldn't it be on the list? That's ridiculous. The only person with a bias is you.

To partially defend Jazz2K, the notion that the XBO's first half exclusive lineup is empty is a subjective statement. It can only objectively true if the XBO actually has zero upcoming exclusives for the first half of 2016. There are some XBO gamers who like singleplayer, story driven experiences and that's where Quantum Break will come into play.

Where Jazz2K is wrong is the claim that listing SFV is biased. True, the PS4 is not the only platform where gamers can play SFV. However, there are consumers who prefer console gaming over PC gaming. Those who prefer the former and want to play SFV will need to purchase a PS4 because it is the only console where the game is accessible. In addition, console exclusives can push hardware sales. Titanfall is a prime example of this.

 

You should read what I said clearly. I said it's "basically empty" when you compare it to Sony. Sony has so much and Microsoft so few that it's "basically" empty. That the people who say Microsoft has a empty lineup aren't really saying that it's really empty and they have 0 games.