Jazz2K said:
Sony has more than MS is the only truth there is to it though and that's where it ends. When I say biased it's about MS first half is empty or that MS has nothing good and then people listing "better" games for PS4 then list 1-2 games for MS forgeting others for some reasons like: it's available on PC so they are irrelevent but then list SFV as a key point for Sony... yeah biased lists. |
Street Fighter V is a 3rd party game. Sony doesn't have control over when SFV comes out. To respond to your PC comment, there are consumers who prefer to play on consoles. If they prefer to play on consoles and want to play SFV, they will need to buy a PS4 because it is the only one where SFV will be available.
Anyways, even if we strictly only look at 1st party games, Sony still wins out. Not only does the PS4 have more upcoming 1st party games than the XBO, but it has more games with confirmed release dates rather than broad release windows. This part is objective as is the PS4 having more exclusives, in general. Whether having more exclusives (in full, platform, or console form) than its competiion is better is subjective. It all comes down to what consumers prefer to play.
If we look at the genres of each exclusive on both sides, the PS4's lineup covers more genres. Therefore, it will appeal to a wider variety of demographics. For example, JRPG fans will prefer to buy a PS4 over the XBO because of games like Digimon, Hyperdimension, Fairy Fencer F, Nights of Azure, or Odin Sphere Leifhrasir. Fighter fans will opt for the PS4 because of Street Fighter V (provided that they prefer console gaming) and Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator. Platformer fans? There are Ratchet & Clank and Shadow of the Beast.
